Year-End Summary

Hello, everyone. Since I started last Month I decided to wrap up this quarter with a few things I have covered last week, possibly include resources, cover new information, etc. There may not be any posts until next year. If there are posts, they will be most likely videos, photos, links, etc. I will also consider upgrading to turn this into an actual website, so anyone wishing to help out, I’d really appreciate that.
Let’s begin with what I have been focusing on for the last month and a half. My posts mainly focused on self-identity, intervention, conflicts, solutions, acceptance, future outlook, etc. But I know there is a lot more to cover over a life time. I can’t cover every field of life to study. It’s like organising otree’s branches from bottom to top. That would take forever. So I usually try to find the main areas that get my interest the most and use that to expand my knowledge and cover a little of everything.
so, let’s go over some things that I thought I’d cover this week. While many people, regardless of where and who they are in this world, everyone is going to have two or more sides. Usually this can be seen as a political spectrum. Life is like one big number line. People tend to fall within extreme categories in whatever it is that is being discussed. Like when we talk about the causes of sexual orientation, one person may say, it’s biologically influenced. Another person would argue that and would say, no, it’s induced and it gets wired into their brain like nueorplasticity. Another person may say it’s both, or another person would say it is neither and would ignore it and move on. So I’m one of those persons who wants to take two sides and find a workaround to reconcile the two opinions and move on.
Many people born with a disability choose not to pursue drastic measures to recover them because their disability not only affects a person’s soma, but their psyche as well. So, I have made it an insentive for a person to consider joining H+ and contributing to research about what it is like to acquire the new ability for the first time in a long time. Plus they would have to be willing to have self-discipline and the willing to put up with rehabilitation to pull through. It is many of these traits people lack, that and their religious supersticions that make them not want to pursue such measures. And there it is again. Why can we not find a way to come to an agreement? What if we found a way to simulate or give them the sensations, the memories of what it is like to do this and that, without having to perform surgery? We would have to use mind-uploading technology in order for that to be successful.
I’ve been researching on hearing, both acoustic and synthetic-wise and what I learned was quite surprising. Many blind hearing-impaired people have no problem tracking directions in modern audio games when playing with earbuds, but when it comes to real life and they are wearing simple digital aids, they can’t determine traffic, a very important barrier to be able to overcome in order to gain access to the world. More research is being done to see how microphones pick up sound, how the noise is processed, etc. This is really advanced for me to go into, but it gave me something to look into. Many of the organisations are focusing more on blindness or deafness as if they were separate, not as if they were combined like the Hellen Keller National Institute. And speaking about Hellen Keller, I was thinking about deaf-blind people before her, people who could have been famous but weren’t because they lacked the courage and or attention and motivation they needed to pull through to the end. Sure, people like Homer were respected in ancient cultures, but they weren’t famous. So it makes it sound like Hellen was the only famous deaf-blind person in the world. People like her were thought to be the cause of the devil and were shunned and or thrown away for experimentation. I have never been attracted to any blindness organisation because they are too professional and hardly take the opportunity to help those in need.
Let me go over cellular memory, for I have been meaning to do so. Basically, there hasn’t been any serious study to figure out whether or not recipients resemble their donors after receiving a heart transplant, for that is usually what happens. My unproven theory is that since major organs are hooked to the peripheral nervous system, there is a way for stray neurones from the brain to work their way into the organ. When that organ is transplanted, those old neurones would be distributed in the new nervous system and the brain would interpret them. It is like taking a memory card from one device to another. I was wondering if these types of memories were more to do with passion and desire, more long-term things, rather than simple, short-term ones. And finally, is intelligence and gender linked? Is knowledge innate? I have read a few books about people with supernatural intelligent brains.
Having an unexplained amount of high intelligence  may result in isolation from other pupils because of their consistency  in correcting others, even if it is not their fault.
It has yet to be  understood how paranormal or supernatural things can be when one can  pick up a piece of paper and decipher the shapes into a set of words.  This is now under investigation because we would like to understand the  genetics involved in this task and what genes are affected and what  parts of the brain are changed, as well as the socialism the person  would be exposed to.
In our society, we classify persons based on  intelligence level, but that is just because we lack an understanding on  their brain power.
As well as focusing on the scientific aspect of this  study, psychological testing is also critical for us to understand the  factors that made this difference and how it will affect them later in  life. A gene is simply a set of instructions given to tell the organelles to follow these rules. When a mutation occurs, usually by internal or external factors, that instruction is ignored or mixed with another and the string continues, leaving a mutated organelle in place. There are names for these, many of which I refrain from using, mainly because I dont’ know them, but also because I don’t want to bore the reader with the scientific jargon without first first understanding it. These genes simply tell the brain how fast neurones should communicate, how long these cells can last, how much hormones to produce, what kinds of hormones, how much blood flow should each side get, and much more to fit in here. Usually a person with such intelligence has a major area of focus that interests them, and naturally, they also lack certain maturities in certain areas.
Maybe I can use those simulators to  simulate high intelligence and low intelligence, fast processing and low  processing, and the storing of memories is also important. Holding onto  memories is easy for some, hard for others. We would like to figure out  how this works in greater detail.
Let us begin with the learning and  capacities. Let us talk about how the brain works. The majority of  people think of our brain as a computer that manages our body both  voluntary and involuntary. We can think about it, or we need not think  about it at all. In the classical organisation of the brain, it is known  as a sensory machine, although modern science is finding it to be called  a task machine because one sence can activate multiple areas of the  brain.
Having said that, let us talk about capacity. In the way we learn  the most basic thing their is to learn, life’s most important or least  important lessons to the most abstract thought of art, learning is very  important in one’s child development. What I am looking into is the  storing of these memories. Is it possible that neurones and  neurotransmitters cary memory in the brain? And yet, science still finds  the brain to be a big mystery, but we are slowly solving it every day.  If we know how memories are stored, then we can learn about how  sometimes, when you least expect it, those cells stored with memories  can be distributed amongst your body’s systems. This might explain the  concept of cellular memory.
Now, let us discuss processing. How long does  it take for bits of these memories to combine together to produce a new  memory? Solving easy or hard math problems, using logic, spelling words,  syntax, diction, etc etc. The time it takes for the process to begin and  for it to end may vary on brain wave speed. I am hoping to do some  studying on how fast neuron cells travel within the brain to see if we  can find ways to speed these up, or slow them down.
Next, we will discuss  genes. We all know that things can be passed on and on. The question is,  what can be passed on and on, and how is this so? What areas of the body  are changed when a gene is modified? We might be able to produce  intelligent people in our society and have them replace those of lower  intelligence.
Finally, how does this affect one’s social construction,  behaviour, and motivation? Will it give them sensational perception,  such as perfect pitch, the ability to know how much one is turning, etc?  What will be the future of this person? Would we disrupt society if we used H+ technology if we genetically-engineered people to all have easy-going personalities and open minds? Maybe balance out the selfishness in the world and introduce new humans with selfless personalities? Problem is that most people do things without looking into the future to see how things would turn out. Our country was founded before people determined how it would turn out in the end. We started this country in debt, and it is not likely that we would ever get out of it. People are closed-minded especially here in our Western world, which is why we have many conflicts. What if we could raise awareness about being more open-minded?
Although this is all referred to the psychology of not just the fact of  what we are, but what we do, the actual anatomical, physiological, and  biological characteristics may play a role in the reconstruction of  gender-building. However, nature only provides us with two reproductive  structures with the exception of intersex, males and females. People can choose to look androgynus, and this should not be confused with any of the other identities, for it has its own set of rules. Thanks to modern science and technology, we are learning how to rebuild  these structures to fit the personality of the new gender  reconstruction. However, there are still some things to consider, genes,  cosmetology, etc. The lengthening and shortening of different bodily  parts will also have to be altered, which is no easy matter. However,  some people are fine with how they appear, but do not desire to pursue  such high levels of manipulation. Sometimes it just depends on luck and  flaws.
Recent research has shown that when in a calm environment, men and women are not from different planets. Both have alike personalities. The only reason why they act different at times is due to the conforming with their fellow members when outside of the relationship, and partly due to attractions. This is why we have the term “cheating” when describing a partner seeing another fellow without them knowing about it. Things like that should not be taken too hard. If same-sex marriage became too much of an issue, what about looking into same-gender marriage, but different sex marriage? What about cross-gendered relationships, would those work? I find this very interesting.
Now, another study I want to conduct is how either sex change or  gender change affects the development of one’s basic learning. You see,  according to popular belief, it is said that one group tend to learn  faster at an early age. Certainly there must be a reason as to why this  is so. Is it because of some anatomical difference in the brain, or is  it through some other factor that is not related to anatomy and  physiology? I would like to learn all of this history and how it  evolved.
The next thing I would like to consider is curvature in the  body. We all know that we like to show off certain areas of our body to  others so as to attract appearance. Suppose one lacked this? It should  not matter. We should primarily consider the person’s personality  and  then use that personality to create the image of the person, regardless  of any body deformity or difference. We can focus on the person’s  appearance as a secondary rather than a primary. Some of these things you may find answers to by reading the previous post, but I outlined them again to give the reader a reminder. Sometimes you may find repetitive sentences or passages. It is like in a piece of music, the chorus or refrain repeats to refresh the reader’s mind.
Thank you for taking part in our work. My hope is that some day we will be able to change the world for the better. We will be able to do everything George Carlin thought we would never do. He accused us of wanting to save our planet just for ourselves and a place to live in, and that we want to save animals for ourselves only. He may have been too harsh, but I do agree with some, if not most of what he says. I hope we will find a way to think outside the box and stillwork for each other, not on each other. People are already finding ways to make meat out of animals without killing them using stem cells. This is good news for vegetarians. I am going to close this post with one final suggestion.
Here are some laws that I thought of proposing for H-plus to follow and to make sure  we are within human rights. These laws would govern H +, just like the laws of robotics would.
All practices involved must follow all moral and ethical guidelines and  must not be inhuman. Example: Cloning humans for benefitial purposes.
Humans should not at any time force another human to undergo a practice  without full explanation of whatever that would be. Instead, they can  persuade and convince other humans to educate them based on the first  law.
All practices must have been approved by governments around the world,  after experimentation with non-human species has shown promise. Clinical  trials can ensure that another human would risk their life to the  practice in hope of enhancing their experience.
Since humans are believed to have the highest conscience above all other  animals on Earth, we must think of ourselves as humans, as if we were  working for each other, not on ourselves. This includes, obsession with  practices, selfishness, selflessness, and respect.
Finally, all laws provided by nature must be obeyed to support the above  laws.
Variations: This last law may be something that may vary depending on  many factors.
All practices involving artificial and or synthetic substances are  strongly discouraged. Instead, we recommend finding natural and  renewable resources to improve another human’s integrity. This includes,  using technology as an expanssion, not as part of the human body.
At this time H+ should consider establishing branches of religions and  supersticions that would enhance their practices more efficiently.  Humans should not exaggerate or fall under any popular science fiction  belief, or that boredom should be avoided. In a 1964 prediction about 2014, humans would become bored because machines would be taking over. We would miss the sounds of nature we would only get to hear when out in the open.
Remember: Everything posted always has exceptions, anybody can contradict them, I may forget something, and everything I said is to the best of my educated knowledge.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s