Controversy Over What Should and Should not be Said on the Internet

Ever since the invention of social media, after blogs and on-line diaries had been invented, people began to lose the opportunity to physically interact. Generation X, Y, and Z are going to be the first to adapt to these changes a lot more than those of older generations or people who oppose of modern society, such as myself. The problem arises just like with anything else, no matter how humans are able to communicate, whether it’s through the phone, mail, telegraph, the internet, or just physical interaction, drama happens, and I’m not talking about drama as in Shakespeare’s time. I am talking about real drama in which a dispute gets out of hand and gossip is usually the main cause of it. Many people, especially teenagers in generation Y and Z, act more immature than they are supposed to be. Many is caused by conformity and the wanting to be like others, to impress one another just to get higher social rankings. If you look back at my rudeness essay along with my other posts, you will find some information that may refresh your mind.
Let’s begin with definitions. What is social media exactly? What is the primary use for it. Why is it here? Social media is a form of social interaction between humans who share a bond whether it would be mutual, relative, or biological. They use a variety of technological devices that hook up to one main host in which the network is hosted. From there, it gets as simple as this. Think of social media as a new planet, a virtual Earth. There are people from all around our real world who join social media. The only difference is that it is all being viewed through a different face than it would be if it was through the phone or through some party line, etc, even radios are different now. Social media can be customised. Your profile is your house. You build your house so others can stop by and check it out as they wander the streets. This is like when you physically go to houses of friends and neighbors, except it is done virtually.
Blogging is somewhat different. Blogging is where you can put up a virtual journal or diary, and depending on what it is, you can let others read it and hope someone will share your interests. You can link blogs to social media to expand your interests to others. Blogs are meant to share thoughts and feelings with others around the world and is not primarily meant for social interaction.
Now, let’s get down to the differences in between real life and virtual interaction. Remember that this is one of many ways you can picture what social media is like. To everyone, social media is simply a page in your browser, a client you use, etc that allows you to connect to the main host, and then you use the controls to find the person you want to interact with and then move on. In real life, people would actually transport themselves over to where the person dwells and then interact with that person. In social media, a person can build their profile, update them, add photos, share other photos, and do a wide number of things. In real life, a person can tack real photos to their door, decorate the insides, make it look neat, and if a friend copies their photo for you, you can share it by putting it inside your house. Perhaps one of the major differences of all is identity. On the internet, identity can be hidden very easily, but location and machine usage is very hard to change. In real life, identity is hard to change because it requires a whole lot of work in body alteration. Many people choose not to take part of the social media because they prefer real-life interaction. This doesn’t keep them from spying on the virtual world. Employers can hunt their employees using a search tool that allows them to track down that person’s virtual house, and then they can check you out.
Chatting versus talking: This is something that has gotten my interest for quite a while. Chatting is basically like telegraphy. You send a person instant mail and then they respond back. This is different than texting or e-mail, which is like telegrams and regular snail mail. Talking or video-camera-talkking is carrying the voice of one person along with their image through a host and have that connection established. In real life, people can talk over the phone or simply talk in open air. Now here is what gets my interest. Could a person actually say something in voice that would be more awkward to utter than it would be for a person to just chat? Chatting offers little emotion than voice, and therefore makes it hard to interpret what a person is really wanting to say. There is a saying that you can write to a fellow something you can never tell them face-to-face.
Now, where does the problem come in? Humans are constantly putting up signs on the walls of their houses from which anyone wandering can see that they’ve had a fight with their partner because of such and such. Or they can no longer be friends with this and that. Or what if they posted a sign proclaiming another person who has no access to or is not a member of that social media, and their friends find about it because of what you said? What about spelling? Since we are primarily chatting, spelling and grammar correction has been a major issue. Of course this would not apply to real-life mail and talking, except for correcting someone on order of rords or something along those lines.
Privacy is a major issue that all humans want to for themselves, based on two philosophies. The first philosophy is that of John Locke, and the second is called Information Wants to be Free. Truth is, our rights are constantly being misinterpreted by ourselves, and we are limiting each other to say what we should say without libel and slander. It is okay to post a sign outside your wall saying that you want this and that, but if you keep it in a general attitude, it may not gain as much attention than if it was specifically targetted at someone or something. Pessimists say you shouldn’t say this because it is offending them even though the original person didn’t think it was rude at all. This is where rudeness is interpreted by humans. Optimists are usually supportive and help people team up to become a unity so that the person doesn’t experience the pain alone.
Now, how do we get this under control? Many such as myself are considering a revolution of sorts to get back into balance. Many want to redefine words that were originally meant to be harmless but are now becoming more pejorative. Some are thinking of shutting down the entire internet service for an hour or some short tim such as what Wikipedia did one day for twenty-four hours. Many are thinking of balancing out privacy since things are now becoming more and more open, like sexuality, gender, etc that are constantly being talked about in the media in our modern society. Many are wanting to start new religionsb based on old ones to fit these changes, many like me are thinking of using H+ to change what we can. Truth is, I don’t know when the day will be when our world will be perfect. It may never be, or it will be but when the day comes when humans are immortal, I doubt I will see that happen.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s